Commercial Litigation in 2026: Observations, Risks and What Business Owners Should Prepare For

Why 2026 Is Likely to Be a Sharper Year for Commercial Litigation

Commercial litigation rarely turns on surprise legal principles. It turns on economic pressure, control disputes, and human behaviour under stress.

As businesses recalibrate for 2026, we are already seeing more disputes arising out of restructures, failed exits, information asymmetry between directors, and aggressive enforcement tactics. Many of these disputes are avoidable but only if they are addressed early and strategically.

1. More Director and Shareholder Disputes — Fewer Clean Exits

The dominant trend heading into 2026 is simple: more businesses are unwinding, and fewer are doing it well.

We are seeing informal wind-downs, “soft exits”, and restructuring decisions made without clean documentation or transparent financial disclosure. In closely held companies, these issues commonly escalate into:

• director and shareholder disputes
• oppression claims
• urgent applications for access to records or injunctive relief

Prediction: 2026 will see fewer negotiated exits and more court-supervised resolutions where trust has eroded.

2. Control of Financial Information Will Be the First Battleground

In most serious director disputes, the conflict begins with information asymmetry. One director controls the bank accounts and accounting software. The other director is left guessing.

Courts are increasingly alert to the use of financial opacity as a control tactic, particularly where:

• financial reporting is delayed or selectively disclosed
• access to company books and records is denied
• decisions are made without transparency

Prediction: Applications involving access to company books and records will continue to rise in 2026 often as the first decisive step in litigation.

Related reading: Denied access to company books and records?

3. Oppression Claims Will Overtake Pure Contract Claims

Contract disputes remain common. But in closely held companies, oppression claims are increasingly used to address patterns of unfairness and exclusion.

Oppression claims are often pursued where:

• shareholders are excluded from management
• financial information is withheld
• restructures disproportionately benefit one party
• share dilution or asset transfers occur without genuine consensus

Prediction: Oppression litigation will be used more strategically in 2026 to force disclosure, exits, buy-outs, and court-supervised restructuring of control.

4. Insolvency Tools Will Continue to Be Misused — and Challenged

Economic pressure brings sharper tactics. We are seeing statutory demands and winding-up threats used as leverage in genuinely disputed matters particularly where the underlying dispute is commercial or governance-based rather than insolvency-driven.

Courts remain clear: insolvency regimes are not debt collection shortcuts.

Prediction: 2026 will see more successful challenges to statutory demands and winding-up applications where there is a genuine dispute or improper purpose.

Related reading: Case study: statutory demand set aside

5. Courts Will Expect Earlier, Cleaner Decision-Making

Judges are increasingly impatient with retrospective justifications, informal governance, and selective disclosure — particularly in high-value disputes. Well-run companies preserve credibility by documenting decisions, maintaining financial transparency, and acting proportionately.

Prediction: Parties who delay, obfuscate, or attempt tactical gamesmanship will be penalised on costs and credibility more frequently in 2026.

6. Early Intervention Will Matter More Than Ever

One of the clearest lessons in modern commercial litigation is that early, targeted court intervention can reduce overall cost and risk. In 2026, we expect more:

• targeted interlocutory applications
• preservation and status quo orders
• applications compelling access to records
• injunctive relief to restrain asset transfers

The “wait and see” approach is increasingly expensive.

What Business Owners and Directors Should Do Now

If you are contemplating an exit or restructure — or you are already experiencing governance tension — practical steps include:

• tighten governance and document key decisions properly
• ensure shared access to financial reporting and banking visibility
• address disputes early, before positions harden
• obtain strategic advice before correspondence escalates

Litigation outcomes are often shaped long before proceedings are filed.

How Boss Lawyers Can Help

Boss Lawyers acts in complex commercial litigation, with particular focus on:

• director and shareholder disputes
• oppression claims
• access to company books and records
• statutory demands and insolvency-adjacent disputes

Next step: If you want to discuss a dispute developing into 2026 (or how to manage an exit or restructure without losing leverage), contact Boss Lawyers for confidential advice.

Contact Boss Lawyers
|
Commercial Litigation
|
Director & Shareholder Disputes

Frequently Asked Questions

Is commercial litigation likely to increase in 2026?

We are seeing more disputes linked to restructures, exits, and information control in closely held companies. Many matters escalate quickly once financial transparency breaks down.

What is the earliest sign a director dispute is developing?

In many cases, it is loss of visibility over financial information delayed accounts, refusal to provide bank statements, or restricted access to accounting systems.

Are statutory demands being used as leverage in disputes?

Yes, particularly where underlying liability is genuinely disputed. Courts remain clear that insolvency processes are not a shortcut for contested debt claims.

When should a business get legal advice?

Early advice is critical when a restructure, exit, wind-down, or governance tension is emerging. Strategic intervention early often preserves options and reduces cost.