If you are dealing with a director dispute, removal application, or breach of director duties matter, our experienced director dispute lawyers Brisbane are ready to help. Contact Boss Lawyers on 1300 267 711 or complete our online enquiry form for a confidential discussion.
This is general information only and is not legal advice. You should obtain professional advice specific to your circumstances.
What Happened
ASIC has permanently banned Trent Giumelli, a Noosa-based operator, from providing financial services and engaging in credit activities. The ban follows ASIC’s finding that Giumelli operated an unregistered managed investment scheme and provided unlicensed financial services over an eight-year period, raising approximately $48 million from investors across 27 property projects.
ASIC’s investigation found that Giumelli’s conduct involved systematic and sustained breaches of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). The scale and duration of the conduct — nearly a decade, $48 million, 27 projects — placed this matter at the serious end of ASIC’s enforcement priorities.
Why This Matters for Queensland Investors and Directors
This is not an isolated enforcement action. ASIC has flagged unregistered managed investment schemes as an ongoing enforcement priority, particularly in Queensland’s property sector. The Giumelli matter is notable for several reasons.
1. The geographic focus: Queensland property
Queensland — particularly the Sunshine Coast, Gold Coast, and regional growth corridors — has seen significant activity in property syndication arrangements over the past decade. Some of these arrangements are properly structured, registered, and licensed. Many are not. The Giumelli matter is a reminder that ASIC is actively monitoring this space, and that the absence of prior enforcement action does not mean a scheme is lawful.
2. The duration of the ban: permanent
ASIC’s decision to impose a permanent ban — rather than a fixed-term suspension — reflects the seriousness with which it views systemic, sustained breaches of financial services law. A permanent ban ends a career in financial services. Directors and promoters who believe ASIC enforcement is manageable or reversible should note this outcome carefully.
3. The investor position: limited recourse
Investors who placed funds into unregistered schemes have limited legal protections compared to those who invest through properly registered and licensed vehicles. In an insolvency scenario — which is frequently the outcome when these schemes unravel — investors rank as unsecured creditors and may recover little or nothing. The regulatory protections that exist for registered managed investment schemes (including compliance plans, responsible entity obligations, and ASIC oversight) simply do not apply.
What Is a Managed Investment Scheme?
Under section 9 of the Corporations Act, a managed investment scheme broadly involves:
- People contributing money or money’s worth as consideration to acquire rights to benefits produced by the scheme;
- The contributions being pooled, or used in a common enterprise; and
- The members not having day-to-day control over the operation of the scheme.
Property syndicates — where investors pool funds to acquire, develop, or manage property — commonly fall within this definition. If the scheme has more than 20 members (or is offered to retail investors), it must be registered with ASIC under Chapter 5C of the Corporations Act. Operating an unregistered scheme that meets this threshold is a criminal offence.
The Warning Signs: What to Look For
If you are a director, promoter, or investor involved in a property syndication or similar arrangement, the following are red flags that the structure may not be legally compliant:
- The scheme has not been registered with ASIC and does not have a Product Disclosure Statement (PDS)
- The promoter does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL) or is not an authorised representative of a licensed entity
- The arrangement relies on exemptions (such as the “sophisticated investor” exemption) without proper verification of investor eligibility
- Investors have no meaningful day-to-day control and are simply told to “trust the process”
- Returns are promised or implied rather than disclosed as uncertain
- The structure has been described as “between friends” or “informal” to avoid regulatory requirements
Director and Promoter Liability
Operating an unregistered managed investment scheme exposes directors and promoters to:
- Criminal penalties under the Corporations Act for operating an unregistered scheme
- Civil penalties including substantial fines
- Banning orders — including permanent bans from providing financial services, as seen in the Giumelli matter
- Personal liability to investors for losses suffered as a result of the unlicensed conduct
- Liquidator claims if the scheme becomes insolvent, including insolvent trading liability and voidable transaction claims
The combination of ASIC enforcement and personal civil liability can be devastating. Directors who believed they were operating a legitimate investment structure — even in good faith — face serious consequences if the structure is found to be an unregistered scheme.
How Boss Lawyers Can Help
Boss Lawyers acts for directors, investors, and liquidators in matters involving ASIC enforcement, managed investment schemes, and related insolvency proceedings. Whether you are facing an ASIC investigation, seeking to understand your exposure as a director or promoter, or pursuing recovery as an investor, we can provide direct, experienced advice.
Contact Mark Harley, Principal Solicitor, on 1300 267 711 or visit bosslawyers.com.au.
This article is general information only and does not constitute legal advice. You should obtain advice specific to your circumstances before taking any action. ASIC enforcement actions are based on publicly available ASIC media releases.
