Last reviewed and updated: April 2026
In
2001, the Australian Taxation Office came out with a ruling GSTR
2001/4 on the consequences of Goods & Services Tax (GST Ruling) on the court orders and out
of court settlements. The GST Ruling has examined the concept of ‘supply’ and the ‘nexus’ that must exist between the payment and supply in order to
establish the relationship of supply for consideration.
As the statutory definition of ‘supply’ under section 9-10 of a New Tax System
(Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (Act)
is exhaustive in nature, the GST Ruling states that due to the broad definition
under the Act, an out of court settlement could be linked to the ‘supply’
definition. The GST Ruling further emphasis on the applicability of GST on the
payments made in fulfilment of the court orders.
The
GST Ruling has also laid down three categories of the supply, namely: (a)
earlier supply; (b) current supply; and (c) discontinuance supply.
‘Earlier
supply’ exists where the dispute is related to an earlier
transaction in which supply was made. ‘Current supply’ refers to supply
that comes into the existence because of the terms created by the settlement.
Whereas the subject of the dispute is a claim of damages, a ‘discontinuance
supply’ is the only supply, in relation to an out-of-court settlement. In
this case, the terms of payment under the settlement agreement would not not
have a sufficient nexus with the discontinuance supply.
‘Current supply’ refers to supply that comes into the existence because of the terms created by the settlement. Whereas the subject of the dispute is a claim of damages, a ‘discontinuance supply’ is the only supply, in relation to an out-of-court settlement. In this case, the terms of payment under the settlement agreement would not not have a sufficient nexus with the discontinuance supply.
We
often see disputes getting resolved without going to the court, or settled
before a final determination, and as a result, a settlement agreement between the disputed parties comes into
existence. In most of the cases, an act
of settlement of the dispute will not be a taxable supply. However, the GST
Ruling does provide that a ‘discontinuance supply’ may have a nexus with
settlement agreement ‘only if there is overwhelming evidence that the claim
which is the subject of the dispute is so lacking in substance that the payment
could only have been made for the discontinuance supply’.
The
claim for damages is excluded from the purview of the taxable supply. The GST
Ruling states that the subject of the dispute before the court and the payment
under the court order or settlement agreement to resolve damages claim will not
attract the definition of ‘consideration for a supply’.
In
the event, the payment made in lieu of an out of court settlement or court
order has a component that only relates partially to a supply, the payment will
be treated as the sum of individual payments for the applicable items. Where a
court order dissects and categories the payment into heads of claim, such will
be accepted as representing the amount of these ‘individual payments’. Whereas
in case of out of court settlement, the parties shall apportion the payments
reasonably to each individual claim in the settlement agreement. If not, the
parties will consequently end up with another legal dispute.
As we
see that the ‘supply’ definition under the Act is exhaustive in nature and where
the settlement agreement is hit by GST provisions, it is recommended to outline
the terms of the GST payment in the settlement agreement and the party liable
to bear the GST costs. It is practical to obtain a piece of legal advice on the
implication of GST on settlement agreements or orders of the court.
If
you ever find yourself in this situation, our experienced team of lawyers can
assist you in negotiating and settling or mediating the terms of the dispute or
help in filing appropriate legal proceedings concerning the dispute.
This
is generalist information only and is not a substitute for legal advice
specific to your circumstances. If you would like further information, please
contact us.
Disclaimer: This article provides general information only and does not constitute legal advice. You should obtain professional advice specific to your circumstances.
How Boss Lawyers Can Help
If you need guidance on this issue, our experienced team can provide practical, strategic advice tailored to your situation. Our practice areas include commercial litigation lawyers.
Contact Boss Lawyers on 1300 267 711 or visit bosslawyers.com.au.
For expert legal assistance, speak with our commercial litigation lawyers in Brisbane today.
This is general information only and is not legal advice. You should obtain professional advice specific to your circumstances. For expert advice, contact Boss Lawyers on 1300 267 711.
